Predicting drug-drug interactions in breast cancer patients treated with CDK4/6 inhibitors and forward planning.

INTRODUCTION: Cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) 4/6 inhibitors are cornerstones in the treatment of Hormone Receptor (HR) positive and Human Epidermal Growth factor (HER2) negative metastatic breast cancer. Given their widespread use in the metastatic setting and emerging use in the adjuvant setting, studying drug-drug interactions (DDI) of these medications is of utmost importance. AREAS COVERED: This review provides key background information on the CDK4/6 inhibitors, palbociclib, ribociclib, and abemaciclib. We discuss drug-drug interactions including those with proton pump inhibitors as well as CYP3A substrates, inhibitors, and inducers. We describe the effect of these drugs on membrane transporters and their substrates as well as those drugs that increase risk of CDK4/6 toxicities. Finally, we explore future directions for strategies to minimize drug-drug interactions. EXPERT OPINION: It is crucial to be mindful of medications that may interfere with drug absorption, such as proton pump inhibitors, as well as those that interfere with drug metabolism, such as CYP3A4 inhibitors and inducers. Additionally, special consideration should be given to populations at higher risk for polypharmacy, such as older patients with greater comorbidities. These interactions and patient characteristics should be considered when developing individual treatment plans with CDK4/6 inhibitors.

Metabolic and toxicological considerations of Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitors for the treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma.

INTRODUCTION: Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitors (BTKi) have been used for the management of human diseases since the approval of the first-in class agent, ibrutinib, by the Food and Drug Administration in 2013 for the treatment of patients with mantle cell lymphoma (MCL). Ibrutinib is a covalent inhibitor along with second-class BTKis: acalabrutinib and zanubrutinib. These well-tolerated agents have transformed the treatment landscape of chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL/SLL). A new class of these inhibitors, non-covalent, might become an answer to the emerging resistance by avoiding the sustained contact with the kinase binding domain. AREAS COVERED: This article examines the chemical composition, mechanism of action, metabolic characteristics, and potential toxicity of inhibitors targeting Bruton tyrosine kinase. A comprehensive search was conducted across English-language articles in PubMed, Web of Science, and Google Scholar. EXPERT OPINION: Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitors have greatly enhanced the armamentarium against lymphoid malignancies including CLL/SLL. Their future lies in the choice of appropriate patients who will benefit from the treatment without significant adverse reaction. Combination chemotherapy-free fixed-duration regimens with targeted molecules will allow for MRD-driven approach in patients with CLL/SLL in the near future.

Metabolism, toxicity and management of fruquintinib: a novel drug for metastatic colorectal cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most diagnosed cancer globally and despite therapeutic strides, the prognosis for patients with metastatic disease (mCRC) remains poor. Fruquintinib is an oral vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) targeting VEGFR -1, -2, and -3, and has recently received approval by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for treatment of mCRC refractory to standard chemotherapy, anti-VEGF therapy, and anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) therapy. AREAS COVERED: This article provides an overview of the pre-clinical data, pharmacokinetics, clinical efficacy, and safety profile of fruquintinib, as well as the management of clinical toxicities associated with fruquintinib. EXPERT OPINION: Fruquintinib is a valuable additional treatment option for patients with refractory mCRC. The pivotal role of vigilant toxicity management cannot be understated. While fruquintinib offers a convenient and overall, well-tolerated treatment option, ongoing research is essential to determine its efficacy in different patient subsets, evaluate it in combination with chemotherapy and immunotherapy, and determine its role in earlier lines of therapy.

Two-Part Phase 1 Study to Evaluate the Taste Profile of Novel Belumosudil Oral Suspensions and Assess the Relative Bioavailability and Food Effect of the Selected Belumosudil Oral Suspension Compared With Oral Tablet Reference in Healthy Male Participants.

Belumosudil is a selective rho-associated coiled-coil-containing protein kinase 2 inhibitor in clinical use for the treatment of chronic graft-versus-host disease. The current tablet formulation may be inappropriate for children or adults with dysphagia and/or upper gastrointestinal manifestations of chronic graft-versus-host disease. This study (NCT04735822) assessed the taste and palatability of oral suspensions of belumosudil, evaluated the relative bioavailability of an oral suspension versus the tablet formulation, and characterized the effect of food on the pharmacokinetics of an oral suspension. Addition of sweetener and/or flavor vehicle improved the taste. Relative bioavailability of 200-mg doses of the oral suspension and tablet in the fed state was similar for belumosudil and its metabolites (KD025m1 and KD025m2), but absorption was faster with the oral suspension (median time to maximum concentration: 2 vs 3 hours). Administration of the oral suspension with food increased exposure compared with fasted administration, with maximum observed concentration being increased by 16% and area under the concentration-time curve from time 0 to the last measurable concentration (AUC0-last) by 19%. Safety and tolerability were consistent with the known safety profile of belumosudil. These results may support administration of a 200-mg belumosudil oral suspension with or without food.

First-Line Osimertinib for Previously Untreated Patients With NSCLC and Uncommon EGFR Mutations: The UNICORN Phase 2 Nonrandomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with uncommon EGFR mutations is a rare subgroup, composing 14% of all EGFR mutations. Objective: To determine the usefulness of osimertinib in previously untreated patients with metastatic NSCLC harboring uncommon EGFR mutations, excluding exon 20 insertion mutations. Design, Setting, and Participants: This multicenter, open-label, single-group, phase 2 nonrandomized clinical trial enrolled patients from April 10, 2020, to May 31, 2022, with a follow-up of 6 months from the date the last patient was enrolled. The study enrolled 42 patients with uncommon EGFR mutations, of whom 40 were eligible. Intervention: Osimertinib, 80 mg once daily, was administered orally to patients. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point was the overall response rate (ORR). The secondary end points were disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), time to treatment failure (TTF), overall survival (OS), duration of response (DoR), and safety of osimertinib. Patients were included in the study on an intention-to-treat basis. Results: Of the 40 eligible patients, 22 were men (55.0%) and the median age was 72 years (range, 39.0-88.0 years). The most common mutations were G719X (20 [50.0%]), S768I (10 [25.0%]), and L861Q (8 [20.0%]). The ORR was 55.0% (90% CI, 40.9%-68.5%) and the DCR was 90.0% (95% CI, 76.3%-97.2%). The median PFS was 9.4 months (95% CI, 3.7-15.2 months) after a median follow-up of 12.7 months (range, 2.7-30.7 months). The median TTF was 9.5 months (95% CI, 5.6-30.3 months), median OS was not reached (NR; 95% CI, 19.3 months to NR), and median DoR was 22.7 months (95% CI, 9.5 months to NR). The ORR for patients with solitary or compound uncommon EGFR mutations was 45.5% (90% CI, 26.9%-65.3%) and 66.7% (90% CI, 43.7%-83.7%), respectively. Median PFS for patients with solitary or compound uncommon EGFR mutations was 5.4 months (95% CI, 3.6-22.7 months) and 9.8 months (95% CI, 5.1 months to NR), respectively. Median OS for patients with solitary or compound uncommon EGFR mutations was 23.0 months (95% CI, 12.3 months to NR) and NR, respectively. Median DoR for patients with solitary or compound uncommon EGFR mutations was 22.7 months (95% CI, 3.6-22.7 months) or NR (95% CI, 5.7 months to NR), respectively. Grade 3 or 4 adverse events were reported by 11 patients (27.5%), and 5 patients (12.5%) developed interstitial lung disease. All adverse events were manageable, and there were no treatment-related deaths. Conclusions and Relevance: Osimertinib showed clinical activity with manageable toxic effects among previously untreated patients with metastatic NSCLC harboring uncommon EGFR mutations other than exon 20 insertion mutations. The results support the use of osimertinib as a treatment option for this patient population. Trial Registration: Japan Registry of Clinical Trials Identifier: jRCTs071200002.

A real-world analysis of trametinib in combination with hydroxychloroquine or CDK4/6 inhibitor as third- or later-line therapy in metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

BACKGROUND: There are no standard third-line treatment options for metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (mPDAC). Trametinib in combination with hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) or CDK4/6 inhibitors for pancreatic adenocarcinoma showed promising efficacy in preclinical studies. However, the regimens have not been well examined in patients with mPDAC. METHODS: Patients with mPDAC who received the combination of trametinib and HCQ or CDK4/6 inhibitors as third- or later-line therapy were reviewed. The efficacy and prognosis were further analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 13 mPDAC patients were enrolled, of whom 8 and 5 patients were treated with trametinib plus HCQ or a CDK4/6 inhibitor (palbociclib or abemaciclib), respectively. All enrolled patients had either KRAS G12D or G12V mutations and had received a median of 3 prior lines of therapy (range, 2-6). The median trametinib treatment duration was 1.4 months. Of the 10 patients with measurable disease, only 1 patient achieved stable disease, and the remaining patients had progressive disease. Moreover, in patients treated with trametinib plus HCQ and a CDK4/6 inhibitor, the median progression-free survival was 2.0 and 2.8 months, respectively, and the median overall survival was 4.2 and 4.7 months, respectively. Moreover, 5 (50%) patients experienced grade 3-4 adverse events in 10 patients with available safety data. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of trametinib and HCQ or CDK4/6 inhibitors may not be an effective later-line treatment for mPDAC, and the current preliminary findings need to be confirmed by other studies with larger sample sizes.

Phase 1 study to evaluate the effects of rifampin or itraconazole on the pharmacokinetics of limertinib (ASK120067), a novel mutant-selective inhibitor of the epidermal growth factor receptor in healthy Chinese subjects.

BACKGROUND: Limertinib is a novel mutant-selective and irreversible inhibitor of the epidermal growth factor receptor under development. A phase 1 open, two-period, single-sequence, self-controlled, two-part study was initiated to characterize the effects of a strong CYP3A4 inducer (rifampin) or inhibitor (itraconazole) on the pharmacokinetics of limertinib. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Twenty-four healthy subjects in each part received a single dose of limertinib alone (160 mg, Part A; 80 mg, Part B) and with multiple doses of rifampin 600 mg once daily (Part A) or itraconazole 200 mg twice daily (Part B). RESULTS: Coadministration of rifampin decreased exposure (area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 to infinity, AUC0-inf) of limertinib and its active metabolite CCB4580030 by 87.86% (geometric least-squares mean [GLSM] ratio, 12.14%; 90% confidence interval [CI], 9.89-14.92) and 66.82% (GLSM ratio, 33.18%; 90% CI, 27.72-39.72), respectively. Coadministration of itraconazole increased the AUC0-inf of limertinib by 289.8% (GLSM ratio, 389.8%; 90% CI, 334.07-454.82), but decreased that of CCB4580030 by 35.96% (GLSM ratio, 64.04%; 90% CI, 50.78-80.77). CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrates that the concomitant use of limertinib with strong CYP3A inducers or inhibitors is not recommended. A single dose of limertinib, administered with or without rifampin or itraconazole, is generally safe and well tolerated in healthy Chinese subjects. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: www.clinicaltrials.gov identifier is NCT05631678.

Pirtobrutinib after a Covalent BTK Inhibitor in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia.

BACKGROUND: Patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) or small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL) have poor outcomes after the failure of covalent Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitor treatment, and new therapeutic options are needed. Pirtobrutinib, a highly selective, noncovalent (reversible) BTK inhibitor, was designed to reestablish BTK inhibition. METHODS: We conducted a phase 1-2 trial in which patients with relapsed or refractory B-cell cancers received pirtobrutinib. Here, we report efficacy results among patients with CLL or SLL who had previously received a BTK inhibitor as well as safety results among all the patients with CLL or SLL. The primary end point was an overall response (partial response or better) as assessed by independent review. Secondary end points included progression-free survival and safety. RESULTS: A total of 317 patients with CLL or SLL received pirtobrutinib, including 247 who had previously received a BTK inhibitor. Among these 247 patients, the median number of previous lines of therapy was 3 (range, 1 to 11), and 100 patients (40.5%) had also received a B-cell lymphoma 2 (BCL2) inhibitor such as venetoclax. The percentage of patients with an overall response to pirtobrutinib was 73.3% (95% confidence interval [CI], 67.3 to 78.7), and the percentage was 82.2% (95% CI, 76.8 to 86.7) when partial response with lymphocytosis was included. The median progression-free survival was 19.6 months (95% CI, 16.9 to 22.1). Among all 317 patients with CLL or SLL who received pirtobrutinib, the most common adverse events were infections (in 71.0%), bleeding (in 42.6%), and neutropenia (in 32.5%). At a median duration of treatment of 16.5 months (range, 0.2 to 39.9), some adverse events that are typically associated with BTK inhibitors occurred relatively infrequently, including hypertension (in 14.2% of patients), atrial fibrillation or flutter (in 3.8%), and major hemorrhage (in 2.2%). Only 9 of 317 patients (2.8%) discontinued pirtobrutinib owing to a treatment-related adverse event. CONCLUSIONS: In this trial, pirtobrutinib showed efficacy in patients with heavily pretreated CLL or SLL who had received a covalent BTK inhibitor. The most common adverse events were infections, bleeding, and neutropenia. (Funded by Loxo Oncology; BRUIN ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03740529.).

Osimertinib and Selpercatinib Efficacy, Safety, and Resistance in a Multicenter, Prospectively Treated Cohort of EGFR-Mutant and RET Fusion-Positive Lung Cancers.

PURPOSE: Acquired RET fusions have been reported at resistance to treatment with EGFR inhibitors in EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC); however, a multicenter cohort of patients with EGFR-mutant lung cancers treated with osimertinib and selpercatinib for RET fusion-mediated osimertinib resistance has not previously been published. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients who received selpercatinib in combination with osimertinib on a prospective expanded access clinical trial (NCT03906331) and single-patient compassionate use programs across five countries were centrally analyzed. All patients had advanced EGFR-mutant NSCLC with a RET fusion detected from tissue or plasma following osimertinib therapy. Clinicopathologic and outcomes data were collected. RESULTS: Fourteen patients with EGFR-mutant and RET fusion-positive lung cancers who experienced prior progression on osimertinib received osimertinib and selpercatinib. EGFR exon 19 deletions (±T790M, 86%) and non-KIF5B fusions (CCDC6-RET 50%, NCOA4-RET 36%) predominated. Osimertinib 80 mg daily and selpercatinib 80 mg twice daily were the most commonly administered dosages. The response rate, disease control rate, and median treatment duration were 50% [95% confidence interval (CI), 25%-75%, n = 12], 83% (95% CI, 55%-95%), and 7.9 months (range, 0.8-25+), respectively. Resistance was complex, involving EGFR on-target (EGFR C797S), RET on-target (RET G810S), and off-target (EML4-ALK/STRN-ALK, KRAS G12S, BRAF V600E) mechanisms; RET fusion loss; or polyclonal mechanisms. CONCLUSIONS: For patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC with an acquired RET fusion as a mechanism of EGFR inhibitor resistance, the addition of selpercatinib to osimertinib was feasible and safe and offered clinical benefit, supporting the prospective evaluation of this combination. See related commentary by Krebs and Popat, p. 2951.

Development of Furanopyrimidine-Based Orally Active Third-Generation EGFR Inhibitors for the Treatment of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

The development of orally bioavailable, furanopyrimidine-based double-mutant (L858R/T790M) EGFR inhibitors is described. First, selectivity for mutant EGFR was accomplished by replacing the (S)-2-phenylglycinol moiety of 12 with either an ethanol or an alkyl substituent. Then, the cellular potency and physicochemical properties were optimized through insights from molecular modeling studies by implanting various solubilizing groups in phenyl rings A and B. Optimized lead 52 shows 8-fold selective inhibition of H1975 (EGFRL858R/T790M overexpressing) cancer cells over A431 (EGFRWT overexpressing) cancer cells; western blot analysis further confirmed EGFR mutant-selective target modulation inside the cancer cells by 52. Notably, 52 displayed in vivo antitumor effects in two different mouse xenograft models (BaF3 transfected with mutant EGFR and H1975 tumors) with TGI = 74.9 and 97.5% after oral administration (F = 27%), respectively. With an extraordinary kinome selectivity (S(10) score of 0.017), 52 undergoes detailed preclinical development.

Consequences of Discontinuing a 4/6 Cyclin D-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor During Endocrine Treatment in Hormone-Sensitive Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients in the Context of the COVID-19 Outbreak.

BACKGROUND: The impact of some hasty medical decision made during the first wave of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) remains unknown. We have evaluated the consequences of one of these precautionary measures: the withdrawal of the cyclin D-dependent kinases 4/6 inhibitor (CDK4/6i) in patients whose metastatic disease was controlled by a combination of endocrine treatment and CDK 4/6i. METHOD: This study was noninterventional, retrospective, multicentric, and included 60 patients with HR+ HER2- metastatic disease. Their disease was controlled with the combination of endocrine treatment and CDK 4/6i. The CDK 4/6i was stopped for two months during the first COVID-19 outbreak. A univariate analysis was performed to assess the risk factors associated with disease progression. RESULTS: During this therapeutic break, 22 (37 %) patients had a radiological and/or clinical disease progression. Among them, the CDK 4/6i was re-introduced to 16 patients (n = 16/22; 73 %). A new line of treatment (chemotherapy or targeted therapy) was initiated due to the rapid symptomatic tumor progression in four patients (n = 4/22; 18 %). Two patients (n = 2/22) died in visceral crisis before another anti-tumoral treatment was introduced. In univariate analysis, the presence of liver metastases increased the risk of metastatic disease progression during the withdrawal of the CDK 4/6 (OR = 6.6; 95 % CI 1.87-23.22; P= .0033). CONCLUSION: Progression was observed in 37% of patients during the two-month treatment interruption of the CDK 4/6i. A prolonged CDK 4/6i treatment interruption in patients with clinical benefit on endocrine treatment does not seem to be a reasonable option in light of these results.

Randomized Phase II Trial of Sunitinib or Cediranib in Alveolar Soft Part Sarcoma.

PURPOSE: Alveolar soft part sarcoma (ASPS) is a rare, highly vascular tumor with few treatment options. We designed a phase II randomized trial to determine the activity and tolerability of single-agent cediranib or sunitinib in patients with advanced metastatic ASPS. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients 16 years of age and older were randomized to receive cediranib (30 mg) or sunitinib (37.5 mg) in 28-day cycles. Patients could cross over to the other treatment arm at disease progression. The primary endpoint was to measure the objective response rate (ORR) for each agent. Median progression-free survival (mPFS) for the two arms was also determined. RESULTS: Twenty-nine of 34 enrolled patients were evaluable for response. One patient on each of the initial two treatment arms had a partial response (ORR: 6.7% and 7.1% for cediranib and sunitinib, respectively). Twenty-four patients had a best response of stable disease (86.7% and 78.6% for cediranib and sunitinib, respectively). There were no significant differences in mPFS for the two treatment arms. Clinical benefit (i.e., objective response or stable disease for a minimum of four or six cycles of therapy) on the first-line tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy did not predict benefit on the second-line TKI. Both drugs were well tolerated. As of August 2021, 1 patient (unevaluable for ORR) remains on study. CONCLUSIONS: The study did not meet its endpoints for ORR. Although both TKIs provided clinical benefit, the outcomes may have been attenuated in patients who had progressed ≤6 months before enrollment, potentially accounting for the low response rates. See related commentary by Wilky and Maleddu, p. 1163.

Development of an improved inhibitor of Lats kinases to promote regeneration of mammalian organs.

The Hippo signaling pathway acts as a brake on regeneration in many tissues. This cascade of kinases culminates in the phosphorylation of the transcriptional cofactors Yap and Taz, whose concentration in the nucleus consequently remains low. Various types of cellular signals can reduce phosphorylation, however, resulting in the accumulation of Yap and Taz in the nucleus and subsequently in mitosis. We earlier identified a small molecule, TRULI, that blocks the final kinases in the pathway, Lats1 and Lats2, and thus elicits proliferation of several cell types that are ordinarily postmitotic and aids regeneration in mammals. In the present study, we present the results of chemical modification of the original compound and demonstrate that a derivative, TDI-011536, is an effective blocker of Lats kinases in vitro at nanomolar concentrations. The compound fosters extensive proliferation in retinal organoids derived from human induced pluripotent stem cells. Intraperitoneal administration of the substance to mice suppresses Yap phosphorylation for several hours and induces transcriptional activation of Yap target genes in the heart, liver, and skin. Moreover, the compound initiates the proliferation of cardiomyocytes in adult mice following cardiac cryolesions. After further chemical refinement, related compounds might prove useful in protective and regenerative therapies.

Phase II study of ceralasertib (AZD6738) in combination with durvalumab in patients with advanced gastric cancer.

BACKGROUND: Targeting the DNA damage repair (DDR) pathways is an attractive strategy for boosting cancer immunotherapy. Ceralasertib (AZD6738) is an oral kinase inhibitor of ataxia telangiectasia and Rad3 related protein, which is a master regulator of DDR. We conducted a phase II trial of ceralasertib plus durvalumab in patients with previously treated advanced gastric cancer (AGC) to demonstrate the safety, tolerability, and clinical activity of the combination. METHODS: This phase II, open-label, single-center, non-randomized study was designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ceralasertib in combination with durvalumab in patients with AGC. The study drug regimen was ceralasertib (240 mg two times a day) days 15-28 in a 28-day cycle in combination with durvalumab (1500 mg) at day 1 every 4 weeks. The primary end point was overall response rate (ORR) by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (V.1.1). Exploratory biomarker analysis was performed using fresh tumor biopsies in all enrolled patients. RESULTS: Among 31 patients, the ORR, disease control rate, median progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival were 22.6% (95% CI 9.6% to 41.1%), 58.1% (95% CI 39.1% to 75.5%), 3.0 (95% CI 2.1 to 3.9) months, and 6.7 (95% CI 3.8 to 9.6) months, respectively. Common adverse events were manageable with dose modification. A subgroup of patients with a loss of ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM) expression and/or high proportion of mutational signature attributable to homologous repair deficiency (sig. HRD) demonstrated a significantly longer PFS than those with intact ATM and low sig. HRD (5.60 vs 1.65 months; HR 0.13, 95% CI 0.045 to 0.39; long-rank p<0.001). During the study treatment, upregulation of the innate immune response by cytosolic DNA, activation of intratumoral lymphocytes, and expansion of circulating tumor-reactive CD8 +T cell clones were identified in responders. Enrichment of the tumor vasculature signature was associated with treatment resistance. CONCLUSIONS: Ceralasertib plus durvalumab has promising antitumor activity, with durable responses in patients with refractory AGC. Thus, a biomarker-driven trial is required. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT03780608.

Ibrutinib plus Bendamustine and Rituximab in Untreated Mantle-Cell Lymphoma.

BACKGROUND: Ibrutinib, a Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitor, may have clinical benefit when administered in combination with bendamustine and rituximab and followed by rituximab maintenance therapy in older patients with untreated mantle-cell lymphoma. METHODS: We randomly assigned patients 65 years of age or older to receive ibrutinib (560 mg, administered orally once daily until disease progression or unacceptable toxic effects) or placebo, plus six cycles of bendamustine (90 mg per square meter of body-surface area) and rituximab (375 mg per square meter). Patients with an objective response (complete or partial response) received rituximab maintenance therapy, administered every 8 weeks for up to 12 additional doses. The primary end point was progression-free survival as assessed by the investigators. Overall survival and safety were also assessed. RESULTS: Among 523 patients, 261 were randomly assigned to receive ibrutinib and 262 to receive placebo. At a median follow-up of 84.7 months, the median progression-free survival was 80.6 months in the ibrutinib group and 52.9 months in the placebo group (hazard ratio for disease progression or death, 0.75; 95% confidence interval, 0.59 to 0.96; P = 0.01). The percentage of patients with a complete response was 65.5% in the ibrutinib group and 57.6% in the placebo group (P = 0.06). Overall survival was similar in the two groups. The incidence of grade 3 or 4 adverse events during treatment was 81.5% in the ibrutinib group and 77.3% in the placebo group. CONCLUSIONS: Ibrutinib treatment in combination with standard chemoimmunotherapy significantly prolonged progression-free survival. The safety profile of the combined therapy was consistent with the known profiles of the individual drugs. (Funded by Janssen Research and Development and Pharmacyclics; SHINE ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01776840.).

Rilzabrutinib, an Oral BTK Inhibitor, in Immune Thrombocytopenia.

BACKGROUND: Rilzabrutinib, an oral, reversible covalent inhibitor of Bruton's tyrosine kinase, may increase platelet counts in patients with immune thrombocytopenia by means of dual mechanisms of action: decreased macrophage (Fcγ receptor)-mediated platelet destruction and reduced production of pathogenic autoantibodies. METHODS: In an international, adaptive, open-label, dose-finding, phase 1-2 clinical trial, we evaluated rilzabrutinib therapy in previously treated patients with immune thrombocytopenia. We used intrapatient dose escalation of oral rilzabrutinib over a period of 24 weeks; the lowest starting dose was 200 mg once daily, with higher starting doses of 400 mg once daily, 300 mg twice daily, and 400 mg twice daily. The primary end points were safety and platelet response (defined as at least two consecutive platelet counts of ≥50×103 per cubic millimeter and an increase from baseline of ≥20×103 per cubic millimeter without the use of rescue medication). RESULTS: Sixty patients were enrolled. At baseline, the median platelet count was 15×103 per cubic millimeter, the median duration of disease was 6.3 years, and patients had received a median of four different immune thrombocytopenia therapies previously. All the treatment-related adverse events were of grade 1 or 2 and transient. There were no treatment-related bleeding or thrombotic events of grade 2 or higher. At a median of 167.5 days (range, 4 to 293) of treatment, 24 of 60 patients (40%) overall and 18 of the 45 patients (40%) who had started rilzabrutinib treatment at the highest dose met the primary end point of platelet response. The median time to the first platelet count of at least 50×103 per cubic millimeter was 11.5 days. Among patients with a primary platelet response, the mean percentage of weeks with a platelet count of at least 50×103 per cubic millimeter was 65%. CONCLUSIONS: Rilzabrutinib was active and associated with only low-level toxic effects at all dose levels. The dose of 400 mg twice daily was identified as the dose for further testing. Overall, rilzabrutinib showed a rapid and durable clinical activity that improved with length of treatment. (Funded by Sanofi; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03395210; EudraCT number, 2017-004012-19.).

A thorough QTc study to evaluate the effects of oral rilzabrutinib administered alone and with ritonavir in healthy subjects.

This study aimed to define the clinically relevant supratherapeutic dose of rilzabrutinib, an oral Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitor, and evaluate potential effects of therapeutic and supratherapeutic exposures on cardiac repolarization in healthy subjects. This was a two-part phase I study (anzctr.org.au ACTRN12618001036202). Part A was a randomized, open-label, three-period, single-dose crossover study (n = 12) with rilzabrutinib 100 mg ± ritonavir 100 mg or rilzabrutinib 1200 mg. Part B was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, four-way, single-dose crossover study (n = 39) with matched placebo, rilzabrutinib 400 mg ± ritonavir 100 mg, or moxifloxacin (positive control). Primary objectives: part A - pharmacokinetics (PK) of rilzabrutinib ± ritonavir, safety, and optimal dose for Part B; Part B - effect of rilzabrutinib therapeutic and supratherapeutic concentration on electrocardiogram (ECG) parameters. ECGs and PK samples were serially recorded before and post-dose. In part A, rilzabrutinib 100 mg + ritonavir led to 17-fold area under the concentration-time curve (AUC0-∞ ) and 7-fold maximum plasma concentration (Cmax ) increases over rilzabrutinib alone. Rilzabrutinib 1200 mg was discontinued due to mild-to-moderate gastrointestinal intolerance. In Part B, rilzabrutinib 400 mg + ritonavir increased rilzabrutinib mean AUC0-∞ from 454 to 3800 ng h/mL and Cmax from 144 to 712 ng/mL. The concentration-QTc relationship was slightly negative, shallow (-0.01 ms/ng/mL [90% CI -0.016 to -0.001]), and an effect >10 ms on QTcF could be excluded within the observed range of plasma concentrations, up to 2500 ng/mL. Safety was similar to other studies of rilzabrutinib. In conclusion, rilzabrutinib, even at supratherapeutic doses, had no clinically relevant effects on ECG parameters, including the QTc interval.

Rationale and design of a phase II trial of dacomitinib in advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients with uncommon epidermal growth factor receptor mutations: a prospective and single arm study (DANCE study).

BACKGROUND: Dacomitinib is a second-generation, irreversible epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI). ARCHER-1050 showed that this agent can improve progression-free survival and overall survival in advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients with sensitive EGFR mutation compared to gefitinib. However, it is unclear whether dacomitinib is effective in patients with sensitizing uncommon EGFR mutations in exon 18-21. The aim of this study is to investigate the safety and efficacy of dacomitinib in these patients. METHODS: This is a single arm, prospective, open label and phase II trial. Sample size will be calculated by a minimax two-stage design method based on the following parameters: α = 0.075, 1-ß = 0.9, P0 = 0.20, P1 = 0.45 and a dropout rate of 10%. A total of 30 eligible patients will be included. Patients will receive continuous oral therapy with dacomitinib (45 mg/day) until disease progression, withdrawal of consent, or unacceptable toxicity, whichever occurs first. The primary endpoint is objective response rate (ORR) per RECIST version 1.1, as assessed by investigators' review. The second endpoint is disease control rate (DCR), PFS, OS, and safety. DISCUSSION: We conduct a single arm, phase II study to investigate the safety and efficacy of dacomitinib in advanced NSCLC patients with sensitizing uncommon EGFR mutations. The results of the DANCE study will provide new data regarding efficacy and safety of these patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT04504071.

The Efficacy and Safety of Anlotinib Alone and in Combination with Other Drugs in Advanced Lung Cancer: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

OBJECTIVE: Lung cancer is a disease associated with high levels of morbidity and mortality, with approximately 2.1 million new cases every year. Anlotinib is a new small-molecule multitarget tyrosine kinase inhibitor independently developed in China that can inhibit the formation of tumor blood vessels and has a therapeutic effect on various cancers. However, the application of anlotinib in lung cancer needs further investigation. METHODS: We collected the progress notes of 43 patients with advanced lung cancer treated at the Oncology Department of Guangzhou Chest Hospital from March 2019 to March 2021. Additionally, we assessed the differences between drug combination therapy and single-drug therapy among patients treated with anlotinib. RESULTS: Patients in both the anlotinib-combination and anlotinib-monotherapy groups experienced remission; however, the overall disease control rate in the anlotinib-combination group was higher than that in the anlotinib-monotherapy group. Reexamination via computed tomography showed that patients in the anlotinib-combination group had better recovery than those in the anlotinib-monotherapy group. Although the overall incidence of adverse reactions in the anlotinib-combination group was higher than that in the monotherapy group, most of the adverse reactions were I-II levels and improved after symptomatic treatment. CONCLUSION: Anlotinib combined with other therapies is better than anlotinib alone for the management of patients with advanced lung cancer.

Efficacy of adjuvant EGFR inhibitors and impact of clinical factors in resected EGFR-mutated non-small-cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis.

Background: The role of adjuvant EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in resected EGFR-mutated non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains unclear. Materials & methods: We evaluated pooled hazard ratio and 95% CI for disease-free survival, overall survival and prespecified subgroups. Results: Seven prospective studies with 1288 patients were included in the meta-analysis. Adjuvant EGFR TKIs significantly improved disease-free survival in EGFR-mutated resected NSCLC (HR: 0.41; 95% CI: 0.24-0.70) and in all subgroups. However, the overall survival benefit was not significant (HR: 0.65; 95% CI: 0.36-1.17). The benefit of adjuvant TKIs may be associated with TKI regimens, treatment duration, pathological stage and EGFR mutation type. Conclusion: Adjuvant EGFR TKIs significantly improved disease-free survival and nonsignificantly improved overall survival in resected EGFR-mutated NSCLC.

For lung cancer patients who undergo radical surgery and whose tumors have EGFR mutation (a specific gene alteration in the tumor tissue), the optimal treatment following surgery is unclear. We summarized the available studies to compare the efficacy of anti-EGFR targeted therapies (EGFR inhibitors) with chemotherapy in patients after surgery. We found patients who received EGFR inhibitors after surgery had longer survival without disease recurrence, and a tendency toward longer overall survival than patients who received chemotherapy or no further therapy. The different treatment regimes, treatment duration, tumor stage and EGFR mutation type may impact the efficacy of EGFR inhibitors in these patients after undergoing surgery.